The article argues that Buddhist fundamentalism in post-coup Myanmar is not separate from military authoritarianism but works alongside it to legitimize repression, especially against women’s,...
The article argues that Buddhist fundamentalism in post-coup Myanmar is not separate from military authoritarianism but works alongside it to legitimize repression, especially against women’s, gender, and sexual minority rights defenders. It describes three main mechanisms of repression: using legislation and religious rhetoric to criminalize activism, enabling physical attacks by security forces, militias, and mobs, and coordinating online harassment, doxing, and surveillance. The piece also discusses how WGSM groups are responding through digital security, relocation, networks, and partnerships, but notes that these measures are strained by fragmented civil society, reduced international funding, and the junta’s efforts to normalize itself through the 2026 elections. It concludes that pluralism, gender justice, and religious freedom are essential to any genuine democratic recovery in Myanmar.